Kristy Hanson

  • A friend of mine in comedy and music dislikes when promoters put together all-female shows and try to sell them that way. To her, it’s a marginalizing gesture, implying that there’s something aberrational about female comics, for example – like, why not just ‘comics’? Why the qualifier? I’d never thought about it that way, but I totally agree.

    Strangely, though, I still feel that Lilith Fair’s all-female lineup is essential. It’s more inspiring to me personally, even though I totally idolize male artists as well (hello, Grant-Lee Phillips and Michael Penn!). Also, I’m generalizing, but I think women can be really competitive – especially because often, we’re forced by others to compete (I refer back to the Tori vs. Sarah story I shared the other day). I try to remind myself all the time that another woman’s success is not my failure. Seeing women at the top of their game like the Indigo Girls, Sarah McLachlan, Bonnie Raitt, Tracy Chapman, etc. all on the same stage back in ‘97 and ‘98 really convinced me that women can achieve more working with instead of against each other.

    There’s also a message of empowerment inherent to Lilith that draws from its female source. Back to an article I quoted in my first blog, “Despite the fact that BeyoncĂ© and Lady Gaga and Taylor Swift and Rihanna are all making waves in pop, they’re mostly still singing about men, singing to men, or titillating men. A place where women sing for themselves and to other women is a feminist act…” And the incredible Ann Powers will always say it better than I do, so I leave you with a link to a recent NPR interview with her that I think you’ll enjoy. Says Ann, warming my lil’ heart, “We have to remember and always reiterate our values, to say it right out: ‘I am a feminist.’”

    2 Comments »

    Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • When I started puzzling over this whole Lilith Fair issue, I started reading any articles I could find on the web. Many included questions like “do we NEED Lilith Fair?” and “is Lilith Fair relevant?” And I thought of this Time magazine article that I read with great interest back in 1997 – seriously, I practically memorized the thing, especially this quote:
    …not too long ago, McLachlan couldn’t buy airplay. “When my album Fumbling Towards Ecstasy came out [in 1994], a lot of radio stations said they couldn’t play me because they already had another singer-songwriter on their playlist,” McLachlan says. “In this case it was Tori Amos. That was very marginalizing because our music is completely different. They were saying, ‘Go away–we’ve added our token female this week.’”

    If we once “needed” Lilith Fair and now we don’t, it must be because the landscape is more favorable to female artists. The brilliant Ann Powers, in an article I read on PopMatters.com, asserts that Lilith’s “purpose may not be so clear now, when female artists dominate the Top 40.” Which immediately made me question: DO women dominate the Top 40?

    I plugged “billboard top 40″ into Google, and the page that came up as the top 40 was a list of albums. I put each of the 40 into categories – female solo, male solo, mixed (which includes mixed-gender duos, bands, and soundtracks), and male bands. (I would’ve made a female band category…but there were none). The percentages came out this way: male solo 41%; mixed 19 %; female solo 24%; male band 16% (put the male bands and male solo artists together, and they make up 57% of the top 40.)

    Of course, I’d need to look at the larger trend. I picked a random week (last week). I’m sure looking at other stats might tell different stories. Journalist Shani Hilton notes some lady-highlights, including the incredible success of artists like Beyonce, Lady Gaga, and Taylor Swift. But I fear that asserting that women in music are doing just fine is a new form of dismissal. Is saying, “you don’t need Lilith Fair, you’ve got Lady Gaga and Taylor Swift” any better than, “We don’t need to play Sarah McLachlan, we’re already playing Tori Amos”?

    Given how much the music industry has changed, comparing 1997 to 2010 is a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison, I know. Now the idea of Tori Amos and Sarah McLachlan competing for airplay seems downright laughable – you might not hear either on a pop station at all! But try to avoid Ms McLachlan at Starbucks! Impossible (not that I mind). Music is consumed in an increasingly fragmented way by ever-expanding niche audiences, and while this can be liberating for independent artists, it becomes insanely difficult for them to rise above what was described at LA’s New Music Seminar this year as “the noise floor.”

    And that brings me to why something like Lilith Fair is still necessary – because it provides, as I mentioned yesterday, an avenue for discovery, especially the discovery of artists in genres that may not make it to radio (or even to Starbucks). To quote Shani Hilton again:
    “This is why Lilith Fair is still relevant. Despite the fact that a few highly packaged women dominate the charts and sell out stadiums, there are dozens of genres and hundreds of female artists who will never make a single Billboard chart, despite being loved by a devoted, if small, group of fans…”

    Tomorrow, a look at why, if it’s still relevant, it’s been such a supposedly troubled concert tour. Later this week, delving more into Lilith and diversity. And in the meantime, your thoughts are welcome.

    1 Comment »

    Tags: , , , , , ,

  • Without Lilith Fair, it’s quite possible that I would never have pursued a career in music – for better or worse! I grew up singing, playing my little plastic keyboards, and recording my very deep, deep thoughts in the form of poetry and songs, as early as my elementary-school years. And once someone heard me sing and encouraged me to sing not just in the choir but by myself (Mrs. Willoughby! I love you still), I started doing just that all the time, in school and in competitions, mostly a mix of the same Italian art songs and soprano musical theater songs that every teenage girl singer sings, and I starred in the school musicals (at my tiny high school, maybe not so hard to be a big fish).

    In the midst of all that, I fell in love with the music of the Indigo Girls. My sister and I memorized every single word and harmonized in the car to 12,000 Curfews – through which I discovered Joni Mitchell, Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Joan Baez. They were my gateway drug to singer-songwriter addiction! I begged for a guitar for Christmas when I was 15, which I received, and I toted it down to a local guitar teacher along with my songbook for “Rites of Passage.”

    When I was 16, I heard about Lilith Fair, and I thought my little teenage feminist heart would burst. Lo and behold, they held a “Lilith Fair Preview” show that December in West Palm Beach, close enough to where my family lived at the time, and my wonderful mom was good enough to take my sister and I to it. I heard the Indigo Girls and Sarah McLachlan live, and that was it. That thing where the “bug” bites you; the moment when you know what you want to do – that was the moment, for me. That energy, that GIRL POWER! I was lucky enough to attend another show the next summer, near Cleveland, where I heard Bonnie Raitt rock out for the first time, and I discovered artists like Catie Curtis and Chantal Kreviazuk. I felt super in-the-know to hear Dido’s songs on a Lilith Fair sampler months – even years – before she shot to fame.

    Lilith Fair spurred my desire to keep writing and singing and learning songs, and on some subconscious level must’ve made me feel like singing and writing songs for a living was viable. I spent hours at the piano teaching myself Sarah McLachlan songs and hours with my guitar teaching myself Indigo Girls songs. And once I learned those chords, I used them, and variations of them, to set my own teen angst to music – often on weekends, when everyone else I knew was out on dates or at parties. What would I have done without that music? I really can’t imagine. The time I spent listening, playing and feeling inspired is one of the few things from adolescence that I can look back and feel warm and fuzzy about.

    Now Lilith Fair is back, and I keep hearing far more bad news than good about it. This may purely be a testament to the media’s penchant for negativity, but it does make me sad, either way. And there’s so much discussion about whether Lilith Fair is “necessary,” or “relevant.” That’s really been troubling me, enough that I feel that I have to investigate. The assertion has been made that we don’t “need” Lilith Fair, because women now dominate the pop charts, and I don’t know if the facts really bear that out, and further, should it be a question of “need,” in the first place? Personally – whether I need it or want it – I think that there should be a Lilith Fair so that women can be inspired the way I was; whether to become artists or just to become empowered to dream a little bigger. For me, Lilith was also about the discovery of new music, and it gave exposure to women who were, perhaps, not being heard enough in other arenas. I do think that women in music (in most genres), still need more exposure than they’re currently getting, and the success of the few at the top certainly prove there’s a market for them. So, in my humble opinion, the music industry still needs Lilith Fair, too.

    All this week, I’m going to be blogging about Lilith, women in music, and what it all means, at least to me, from various angles. I hope that you’ll chime in as well! Tomorrow: women dominate the top 40 – true or false?

    No Comments

    Tags: , , , , , , , , ,