<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kristy Hanson :: Los Angeles Singer-Songwriter &#187; popmatters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kristyhanson.com/tag/popmatters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kristyhanson.com</link>
	<description>A singer-songwriter&#039;s life in LA...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:39:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>lilith part II: how far have we come?</title>
		<link>http://www.kristyhanson.com/2010/07/27/lilith-part-ii-how-far-have-we-come/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kristyhanson.com/2010/07/27/lilith-part-ii-how-far-have-we-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristy Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music, food, LA, and other things I love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lilith Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popmatters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah McLachlan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shani Hilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tori Amos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristyhanson.com/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I started puzzling over this whole Lilith Fair issue, I started reading any articles I could find on the web. Many included questions like &#8220;do we NEED Lilith Fair?&#8221; and &#8220;is Lilith Fair relevant?&#8221; And I thought of this Time magazine article that I read with great interest back in 1997 &#8211; seriously, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I started puzzling over this whole Lilith Fair issue, I started reading any articles I could find on the web. Many included questions like &#8220;do we NEED Lilith Fair?&#8221; and &#8220;is Lilith Fair relevant?&#8221; And I thought of this <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,986728-3,00.html">Time magazine article</a> that I read with great interest back in 1997 &#8211; seriously, I practically memorized the thing, especially this quote:<br />
<em>&#8230;not too long ago, McLachlan couldn&#8217;t buy airplay. &#8220;When my album Fumbling Towards Ecstasy came out [in 1994], a lot of radio stations said they couldn&#8217;t play me because they already had another singer-songwriter on their playlist,&#8221; McLachlan says. &#8220;In this case it was Tori Amos. That was very marginalizing because our music is completely different. They were saying, &#8216;Go away&#8211;we&#8217;ve added our token female this week.&#8217;&#8221;</em></p>
<p>If we once &#8220;needed&#8221; Lilith Fair and now we don&#8217;t, it must be because the landscape is more favorable to female artists. The brilliant <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/ann_powers/">Ann Powers</a>, in an article I read on <a href="http://www.popmatters.com/pm/article/127720-sarah-mclachlans-revived-lilith-faces-a-tough-marketplace">PopMatters.com</a>, asserts that Lilith&#8217;s &#8220;purpose may not be so clear now, when female artists dominate the Top 40.&#8221; Which immediately made me question: DO women dominate the Top 40? </p>
<p>I plugged &#8220;billboard top 40&#8243; into Google, and the page that came up as the top 40 was a list of albums. I put each of the 40 into categories &#8211; female solo, male solo, mixed (which includes mixed-gender duos, bands, and soundtracks), and male bands. (I would&#8217;ve made a female band category&#8230;but there were none). The percentages came out this way: male solo 41%; mixed 19 %; female solo 24%; male band 16% (put the male bands and male solo artists together, and they make up 57% of the top 40.) </p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;d need to look at the larger trend. I picked a random week (last week). I&#8217;m sure looking at other stats might tell different stories. Journalist Shani Hilton  <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=renaissance_fair">notes some lady-highlights</a>, including the incredible success of artists like Beyonce, Lady Gaga, and Taylor Swift. But I fear that asserting that women in music are doing just fine is a new form of dismissal. Is saying, &#8220;you don&#8217;t need Lilith Fair, you&#8217;ve got Lady Gaga and Taylor Swift&#8221; any better than, &#8220;We don&#8217;t need to play Sarah McLachlan, we&#8217;re already playing Tori Amos&#8221;?</p>
<p>Given how much the music industry has changed, comparing 1997 to 2010 is a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison, I know. Now the idea of  Tori Amos and Sarah McLachlan competing for airplay seems downright laughable &#8211; you might not hear either on a pop station at all! But try to avoid Ms McLachlan at Starbucks! Impossible (not that I mind). Music is consumed in an increasingly fragmented way by ever-expanding niche audiences, and while this can be liberating for independent artists, it becomes insanely difficult for them to rise above what was described at LA&#8217;s New Music Seminar this year as &#8220;the noise floor.&#8221; </p>
<p>And that brings me to why something like Lilith Fair is still necessary &#8211; because it provides, as I mentioned yesterday, an avenue for discovery, especially the discovery of artists in genres that may not make it to radio (or even to Starbucks). To quote Shani Hilton again:<br />
<em>&#8220;This is why Lilith Fair is still relevant. Despite the fact that a few highly packaged women dominate the charts and sell out stadiums, there are dozens of genres and hundreds of female artists who will never make a single Billboard chart, despite being loved by a devoted, if small, group of fans&#8230;&#8221; </em></p>
<p>Tomorrow, a look at why, if it&#8217;s still relevant, it&#8217;s been such a supposedly troubled concert tour. Later this week, delving more into Lilith and diversity. And in the meantime, your thoughts are welcome. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kristyhanson.com/2010/07/27/lilith-part-ii-how-far-have-we-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>baby steps&#8230;new review in PopMatters!</title>
		<link>http://www.kristyhanson.com/2007/09/12/baby-stepsnew-review-in-popmatters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kristyhanson.com/2007/09/12/baby-stepsnew-review-in-popmatters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristy Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popmatters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristyhanson.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve gotten another review today; not as glowing as the first (how could it have been?) but from a very well-respected, well-known online publication. I&#8217;m pretty happy- I got a very respectable 7 out of 10 on their scale, and while it&#8217;s never thrilling to hear that someone thinks you&#8217;re nothin&#8217; new, the reviewer clearly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="blogSubject">I&#8217;ve gotten another review today; not as glowing as the first (how could it have been?) but from a very well-respected, well-known online publication. I&#8217;m pretty happy- I got a very respectable 7 out of 10 on their scale, and while it&#8217;s never thrilling to hear that someone thinks you&#8217;re nothin&#8217; new, the reviewer clearly gave me his full attention and a very thoughtful, mostly very positive review. I really appreciate that.</p>
<p>Check it out and see what you think! <span style="color: #003399;"><a href="http://www.popmatters.com/pm/music/reviews/kristy-hanson-already-gone/">PopMatters review</a></span>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very excited that the album is finally starting to get out there. When you do something like this on your own &#8211; or maybe even if you have a major label and machinery behind you &#8211; you realize that it&#8217;s a long, long road and you better enjoy the steps along the way. As long as I am even taking steps, no matter how small, I&#8217;m enjoying the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kristyhanson.com/2007/09/12/baby-stepsnew-review-in-popmatters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

